Previous Topic Back Forward Next Topic
Print Page Dr. Frank Dieterle
Ph. D. ThesisPh. D. Thesis 9. Results  All Data Sets9. Results All Data Sets 9.3. Methanol, Ethanol and 1-Propanol by the RIfS Array and the 4l Setup9.3. Methanol, Ethanol and 1-Propanol by the RIfS Array and the 4l Setup 9.3.4. Conclusions9.3.4. Conclusions
About Me
Ph. D. Thesis
  Table of Contents
  1. Introduction
  2. Theory Fundamentals of the Multivariate Data Analysis
  3. Theory Quantification of the Refrigerants R22 and R134a: Part I
  4. Experiments, Setups and Data Sets
  5. Results Kinetic Measurements
  6. Results Multivariate Calibrations
  7. Results Genetic Algorithm Framework
  8. Results Growing Neural Network Framework
  9. Results All Data Sets
    9.1. Methanol and Ethanol by SPR
    9.2. Methanol, Ethanol and 1-Propanol by SPR
    9.3. Methanol, Ethanol and 1-Propanol by the RIfS Array and the 4l Setup
      9.3.1. Signals and Data Preparation
      9.3.2. Mixtures by the RIfS Array
      9.3.3. Mixtures by the 4l Setup
      9.3.4. Conclusions
    9.4. Quaternary Mixtures by the SPR Setup and the RIfS Array
    9.5. Quantification of the Refrigerants R22 and R134a in Mixtures: Part II
  10. Results Various Aspects of the Frameworks and Measurements
  11. Summary and Outlook
  12. References
  13. Acknowledgements
Research Tutorials
Site Map
Print this Page Print this Page

9.3.4.   Conclusions

Ternary mixtures of methanol, ethanol and 1-propanol measured by the RIfS array setup and by the 4l setup could be successfully quantified. The application of the growing neural network framework instead of the non-optimized neural networks resulted in significantly improved calibrations again. The variable selection of the framework for the array setup is quite astonishing, since only the sensor signals of 2 sensors out of 4 sensors are used. As the framework selects the most predictive variables, it can be concluded that the time domain of 2 sensors contains more information than the parallel (static) information of all 4 sensors together. This is an impressive demonstration, how the time-resolved measurements of few sensors can render the application of many parallel sensors with different sensitivities redundant. The static evaluation of the 4 sensors, which corresponds to the sensor signals at the end of exposure to analytes, shows that the time-resolved evaluation of the sensor signals is highly superior even though the static sensor evaluation is not a mathematically underdetermined system. It was demonstrated that smoothing improves the calibration of measurements performed by thin sensitive layers whereas the calibration deteriorates for measurements performed by thick sensitive layers when smoothing the sensor signals. Furthermore, the 4l setup can be used as single sensor device for a multicomponent quantification. Compared with the array setup, the price of miniaturization and cost reduction has to be paid in terms of extended measurement times respectively higher prediction errors.

Page 113 © Dr. Frank Dieterle, 14.08.2006 Navigation